Omaze Reviews

Omaze
( 16 reviews )
Website: www.Omaze.com

Omaze is a company that takes a crowdfunding approach to charity fundraising by allowing users to donate to a charity and have a chance to win various prizes and experiences.

The company states they have helped raise over 150 million dollars and support over 350 charities.

How Does Omaze Work?

Omaze offers a range of experiences and prizes in various categories such as travel, celebrity encounters, vehicles, and unique merchandise.

Participants can enter to win these prizes by purchasing entries, with a portion of the proceeds going to support charitable organizations.

Some of the causes supported by Omaze include education, health, environment, disaster relief, and social justice.

The platform operates on a sweepstakes model, where the more entries you purchase, the higher your chances of winning.

Omaze states their model democratizes traditional charity auctions by giving as many people access to their opportunities as possible, and they do this by pricing their donations to win experiences for as little as $10.

The company also offers a free entry method, allowing participants to enter without making a purchase.  This ensures the sweepstakes remain fair and accessible to everyone.

Omaze emphasizes transparency in its operations, providing information about the charities they support, the percentage of funds raised for each cause, and their partnerships with nonprofit organizations.

It is also worth noting that Omaze sweepstakes are open to participants from various countries, subject to specific eligibility requirements outlined in the official rules for each sweepstakes.

Cost & Price Plans

As mentioned above, this website organizes charitable opportunities which people can win for a donation of as little as $10, but donation requirements will vary depending on the individual fundraising opportunity. 

Typically a $10 donation equates to 20 entries into the prize raffle, which equates to 1 entry for every $0.50 donated.  For larger donations, the proportion of entries increases and their equivalent cost decreases.

For example, a $150.00 donation nets 2000 entries, meaning 1 entry for about every 7 cents donated.

Omaze states that their company takes approximately 12-20% of the net funds collected for their operational costs, and 60% - 75% of funds ultimately end up going to the charities for which they are raising the money. 

Omaze Customer Reviews

Omaze has received mixed reviews from customers.

Many users have praised the platform for its exciting prizes, user-friendly website, and commitment to supporting charitable causes.

Some winners have shared their positive experiences, confirming that they received their prizes and enjoyed once-in-a-lifetime experiences.

However, there have also been negative reviews.  Some customers have reported difficulties in navigating the website and understanding the entry process.

Others have raised concerns about the legitimacy of the sweepstakes, citing a lack of transparency in the winner selection process.

Omaze receives and 'A+' rating from the BBB, with 4.31/5 stars from 130+ customer reviews.  

The company received 32 customer complaints in the last 3 years and 4 complaints in the last 12 months

Competitors and Alternatives

Omaze stands out from other fundraising platforms due to its unique model, which combines charitable giving with the chance to win high-value prizes and experiences.

This approach aims to make the platform more engaging and entertaining compared to traditional crowdfunding websites or donation platforms.

However, there are other services like Prizeo and CharityStars that also offer the opportunity to win unique experiences and prizes while supporting charitable causes.

These platforms may have different prize offerings and charity partnerships, so it's a good idea to explore various options to find the best fit for your interests and the causes you care about.

Omaze Updates

Omaze's CEO, Matt Pohlson, announced that as of January 28, 2023, the company is changing its approach and will be simplifying the experiences offered by the company.

During this transitional period new experiences will not be added to Omaze.com for users in the US.

The company will still honor all US experiences already won and donations made to its charity partners, which total $160 million worldwide.

For users in the UK, Omaze's live draws can still be accessed at omaze.co.uk.

To stay updated on future experiences, users are encouraged to follow Omaze on Facebook and Instagram.

The Bottom Line

Omaze offers an engaging and unique approach to fundraising by combining charitable giving with the chance to win exciting prizes and experiences.

With a user-friendly platform and a commitment to supporting various causes, Omaze presents an interesting option for those looking to give back while also having fun.

However, potential users should be aware of mixed customer reviews and consider exploring similar services like Prizeo and CharityStars to find the platform that best suits their preferences and desired causes.

As always, it's essential to read the terms and conditions and sweepstakes rules carefully before participating.

If you have any experience with Omaze or their services, please leave your reviews below.

See Also:  Does Corporate Philanthropy Really Exist?

You may also be interested in

Omaze Customer Reviews

  • Sort Reviews By:

Rubbish Customer Sevice
July 25, 2023

I win £10 vouchers which are rarely honoured due to issues at Omaze...no one sorts the problem out..thinking of stopping paying fee.

If it's too good to be real...It's not!
September 21, 2022

What a load of pre-staged internet flooding of half truth and PR crap.

Just one more scam to separate stupid people from their money.

All the hype has been created by their own people.

No customer service at all.
November 10, 2021

Entered donation. no receipt emailed to me as described. Contacted customer service through several phone and email messages.

Terrible, may not be legit.

Watch Out non US! MISLEADING!
August 31, 2021
Extremely misleading as certain countries are excluded from winning, but when you register, people from these countries are allowed to register, and the country name appears on the drop down under address. Only when you read the fine print you realize even if you did win and were allowed to register from a country excluded from winning, you are not eligible.

No trust
February 4, 2021
The weirdest thing is that almost all of the winners are from US states.. it's like only US citizens are eligible to win..then why does Omaze advertise everywhere?? No proof, no transparency, NO TRUST!!!

LouisFourie August 31, 2021

Extremely misleading as certain countries are excluded from winning, but when you register, people from these countries are allowed to register, and the country name appears on the drop down under address. Only when you read the fine print you realise even if you did win and was allowed to register from a country excluded from winning, you are not eligible.

Feels like scam
June 20, 2020
I donated to several charities. when I inquired: how exactly the lottery system works? Is it transparent? they said once they get winner they take 2 weeks in silent research to see if the person should receive the winnings, background check etc.that was already really strange. you could be a winner but may be you don't qualify alto you sent your money to them??.. hmmm. They stopped responding.I learned that here is no way to know how much they collect and what percentage goes to charity, NO way to know how they do the lottery....

stole credit card info
April 25, 2020
I donated for the raffle to Omaze and within a couple of hours my bank alerted me to a charge for $162 to chipotle which was not my charge. This was the only charge I made on my account before the chipotle charge. I believe someone got my # from this transaction. Then when you try to contact them there is no phone number. what the heck?!?

Scam
January 29, 2020
Profit for the owner not Charity

MichelleBuckley April 25, 2020

I donated for the raffle to Omaze and within a couple of hours my bank alerted me to a charge for $162 to chipotle which was not my charge. This was the only charge I made on my account before the chipotle charge. I believe someone got my # from this transaction. Then when you try to contact them there is no phone number. what the heck?!?

Stuff
September 8, 2019
Responding to a note about getting the auction prizes. I have been delivered t shirts orders and other merchandise for donating. They screwed up once and ultimately made it right. It was a little sloppy on the service side but we were made whole.

SeanWarren November 16, 2020

fake account. Omaze is a scam.

Transparency standards of Omaze are unacceptably low for company working with charity organizations.
June 14, 2019

Transparency standards of Omaze are unacceptably low for company working with charity organizations. I was not able to find any financial reports or details about past sweepstakes.

I would like to know how much they had raised and transferred to each charity after each contest. What is their profit in comparison to money transferred to actual charity? The only number we have is: “… Omaze has given over $100 million to charity!” Since the company is running for more than 6 years, it was 16.7 million per year in average. I am wondering where exactly all this money goes. And I am even more concerned since I have found “Over $100 million raised to support charity” on the other page. “Why is that so important and what is the difference between “raised” and “given”?” - you would probably ask. Let us read their official statement:

“When you contribute $10 for the chance to win a celebrity experience (set visit, dinner date, tickets to a premiere, etc.), $6 is donated to charity, $2.50 on average goes towards marketing expenses and credit card fees, and Omaze nets the remaining $1.50. A $10 contribution for the chance to win a prize-based experience (like a car, vacation or tuition) breaks down as follows: $1.50 is donated to charity; $7 typically goes to sourcing and shipping the prize, covering the winner’s taxes, marketing the experience, and processing credit card fees; and $1.50 goes to Omaze. These experiences require substantially more resources to secure the prize and help spread the word.”

So, only 15% - 60% goes to actual charity. When you are in a not-for-profit sector nobody expects you to make money. Generally, we want charity to take money we made and deliver promise with as little overheads as possible. Unfortunately, this is not a strategy to get the best impact for your money. Omaze is bragging that their for-profit model enables them to expand marketing services “far beyond what’s usually done in the nonprofit space”, and therefore increase the total dollars raised for partners. Unfortunately, I have no data to prove whether it is true or not. As a financial professional I would agree with some of Dan Pallottas’s ideas. Yes, it is important to invest in your growth, but such growth should be measurable. I can not disagree that 90% of $100 000 is less than 60% of $500 000 ($90 000 vs $300 000), but 90% of $100 000 is more than 15% of $500 000 ($90 000 vs $75 000). At the same time overheads for non-profits becomes revenues if you are private for-profit organization. When you are getting fixed portion of the pie (15%) the bigger the pie - the better for you, but when you really trying to maximize benefits for charity partners it is not that easy. Due to decreasing nature of return, at some point, company would have to cut marketing spendings since they are not bringing positive return any more. It is clear conflict of interests for Omaze, and I would like to know how they are handling it.

And there is a final question for the company - what sort of business is that?

We can assume that this is some sort of marketing platform for charities, then why does it charge 60% of marketing budget ($1.50/$2.50) – that is insane. So, I would believe that Omaze is in lottery style business and using legal loopholes to run it. It looks like they need charities to make it more legit.

levipayne September 01, 2019

What they get for "advertising" is what the buy to give away, not just ads. I ran a charity to give away a motorcycle for two years running. The first bike was our own expense, but after that we used a percentage to buy another for the following year. Thats how it is still non-profit. Now, some companies out there don't spend what they say, but still work the same way. Like if I said I was going to now give away a $11 000 motorcycle this year, but only spent $8 000. They still make you think they spent the 11 000 without directly lying about it by stating something like "win this $11 000 200HP bike" so it makes you assume they spent 11 000 on it. So this is kinda my fine print I look for before donating to a sweepstake charity.

And no I'm not siding with them, I'm just shedding some light whille reading reviews seeing who they are lol.

Anton Burdin September 01, 2019

I got your point, but Omaze is not a charity at all. This is for profit middle men.

Scott H October 10, 2019

Anton, thank you for bringing these points up. I've been donating, but feeling uneasy with the lack of transparency.

Also, if you look them up on www.charitynavigator.org there is no information because of some loophole that looks suspicious:

"FILING REQUIREMENTS: 990 - Required to file Form 990-N - Income less than $50,000 per year"

This seems to mean that they claim to make less than $50,000 in order to avoid having their financials viewable. If someone can clarify that as incorrect, I would gladly stand corrected.

With such grand amounts boasted on the site, but no financials available on charitynavigator, it has to be sketchy.

Scott H October 10, 2019

Since they clearly refer to being a for-profit model, the listing in charitynavigator must be for a previous incarnation.

But, Anton's points about that model are still very relevant.

Kat June 20, 2020

This is so upsetting. All of the above and plus: I have written to Omaze, was just carious how transparent they lottery system is. Is it a 3rd party? no answer.... so they can pick whom ever they want...the only they they did write that after "picking" a winner they do a 10 days- 2 weeks of background check to make sure the winner qualifies. What is that mean? so you can be paying your money, lets say, they are doing a legit lottery system of some sort and they can still decide that you don't qualify (reasons?) never disclosed and you payed won but never knew you won... total scam. non profit is just used for they own gain.

Sketchy Scam
May 31, 2019

Last year they “raised” $100,000,000 for charity.

According to their website that equates to:

$666,000,000 grossed

$466,000,000 spent on ads/prizes

$100,000,000 given to charity

$100,000,000 pocketed. I mean spent on running the lottery—I mean charity.

Lord know how much more since then.

Great Job
May 13, 2019
Keep doing what you do, I am a donator myself and although I have never won, I am ok knowing my donations are going toward a great cause. I will keep entering and keep crossing my fingers, (especially with the upcoming Lambo give-away) that I will win. Regardless, I will keep donating, because it is the right thing to do.

Lina Tsakmakis July 24, 2020

You need to stop giving them your money and support a charity direct and buy a lotto ticket . This is a con you will never win x am so sorry to say . Or this is a false review then I am right it's a con .

Legitimacy
April 30, 2019
I sincerely question the legitimacy of this website. I understand the intent; and that's great; however, do the "winners" ever get their "prize with the celebrity" and does the money collected actually reach the charity? Keeping 20% of the top seems rather steep for a charitable website - despite the best intentions behind it. I think I'll keep my money and hope to one day run into my celebrity; and if not, I'll admire them on the big screen, in the tabloids and on social media. I'll donate directly to their charities, or the ones they endorse with the sincere hope it is truly going to good use!

The greater good
March 26, 2019
I think it’s a great idea. People will give when there is a chance to gain and costs are not free. I’m guessing they have a big staff and website costs. Whoever is donating a Ferrari, Lamborghini is amazing. More money is going to charity now than before and that’s the greater good. They should be able to get the number down to 15 or 10% but in the end it’s still a good thing and a fun way to donate.Also it has created jobs which is great.

Omaze: Good idea but must be transparent
December 24, 2017
Giving people the chance to get some perks while donating is good but Omaze should be clear with their terms and conditions. I have donated via Omaze (I want to meet Matt Stone and Trey Park and John Oliver ;) ) but it was not clear whether the prize is eligible for people outside of USA (luckily they do). I understand that maintaining a website has its costs so Omaze should just say out right that they take a 20% cut for every donation.

AimeeBranson May 15, 2019

I agree with the transparency. Even if I don't win, I think an email should go out afterwards congratulating the winner, who has the right to stay anonymous but it would be cool if it were like from say, 'Tuscon, AZ' or some such.

More importantly, I'd like that email to say something to the effect of 'this campaign raised $X' towards this charity so that everyone is getting an after-action report.

And if Omaze doesn't want to be responsible for fulfillment of say a tshirt, then perhaps provide a code for a 'free shirt' to the donor for use in an online store, wherever the shirt is coming from, so you have power to submit your shirt request and get it sent.

Horrible scam
November 15, 2017

Omaze.com was started by two ridiculous guys who have never worked in their lives.

They are abetted by “stars” to get you to contribute to charity like

Autism Speaks or Veterans organizations by promising stuff like “George Clooney gives you compliments for 45 seconds” or “win a Valentine’s Date with Idris Elba" ($750000 raised..) HOWEVER these two twerps keep 20% of the donations! So they kept $150,000 for just the one Idris Elba deal!

Now they are doing Jon Stewart’s, Colbert’s, Seth Meyer’s “Night of Too many Stars” for autism. You can sit under Colbert’s desk, sit with Seth and writers for a meeting then 20% goes AGAIN to these twerps! So if $4 million raised, they keep $800,000 for one night! It should go to autistic adults NOT these jerks of Omaze!

These awful celebrities worth tens of millions of dollars should say up front that Omaze keeps 20% BUT THEY NEVER DO!

HollyNoel February 08, 2018

They are upfront about the amount. All fundraising organizations take a percent for overhead, some as high as 40%. If you spent a full time job prepping events, maintaining online face, and even paying employees to help, you would understand it’s not feasible to give 100%.

AngelaAnne Zbeetnoff-Kinsey February 11, 2018

I agree with Holly everything takes work. At least you know the money that you want to send is going to an actual charity and not some internet scam artist that may or may not run away with let's say your iPhone!

Sean August 02, 2018

They have operating costs, you knucklehead. Do you work for free?

LarrySalmi August 20, 2018

If Omaze was a total scam, couldn't the celebrities they use for photos sue Omaze?

Sam K Darwish October 09, 2018

Most charities keep over %90 for profit, so %20 doesn't seem that bad at all tbh.

GordonSeirup October 16, 2018

https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pallotta_the_way_we_think_about_charity_is_dead_wrong?language=en

PaulWatchman December 29, 2018

Wow - i think that is one of the most eye-opening, informative Ted talks I've seen. Thank you for sharing

KarinaCuenca April 26, 2019

Is there any way to prove that these opportunities have been paid out? Anyone win any of these and can provide insight? Thanks!

DonnaJones September 24, 2021

They have never said it was a non profit organisation. In one way I see your point however 600,000 was given to charity and they kept 150,000. Your looking at the 150,000 as a negative but not looking at the 600,000 as a positive. If it was the other way around then they need shutting down . Seems to me is sour grapes you didnt come up with the idea first