About Square to Square Method
1 ‘Square to Square Method’ Review
Scam - Golf
The initial offer liberally uses the word "Free", but actually asks you for what looks like a small (sub-$50) payment for a small number of videos, once you click on the "free" offer. No readily-seen indication that there is any further financial commitment.
So . . . Looks OK. The guy sounds genuine. Not much investment to see if this all works out.
But then, on the way out of the transaction, you are bombarded by offer after offer for other products.
Finally managed to exit & received the initial offer of videos.
But then . . . further monthly debits of approx $30 kept being taken out of my credit card. No response to emails as to why this was being done. Had to cancel my credit card to stop it.
Does the program work: despite trying it every week for a month, there was no noticeable improvement in accuracy of drives or irons. My average score over the period was no better than for the previous similar period before changing.
The claim that the method adds extra distance to your drives proves to be rubbish in reality as well as logic.
Logically, if your club head is slower (which it has to be if you use a restricted backswing and body rotation and no wrist cock-uncock) then the ball is not going to go as far. Same applies with throwing a baseball, kicking a football or any sport involving striking an object: it's not going to go as far. No logical or practical reason why swinging a golf club would be any different and that's the way it works out: slower club head speed = less distance
In my case, on drives, my average distance on a level fairway, no wind, average temperature etc is 220-240 meters. The best I could manage with the restricted swing was about 200m, with most being less than that.
Consistent accuracy was no better, other than a slightly higher number of off-centre drives finishing just on the fairway (because of the shorter distance), instead of several metres into the rough.
Granted, if you were hacking at drives and mistiming the whole thing, then maybe a smaller, steadier swing might deliver a longer result.
To get the same distance as previously out of my irons, I had to go down an average to 2 irons e.g. 7 instead of a 9.
And . . . on top of that . . . the email barrage every week for extra products & purchases is relentless, once you order the initial videos.
And . .. almost every web site I log on to now has ads to Doug Tewell's site, even if the website I'm going to has nothing to do with golf.
So . . . very disappointing that a supposedly trustworthy golf professional (or someone who is using him as the frontman) has set up this very distasteful website experience.